With great content must also come great punctuation. Avoid overuse of parentheses.
This article has been cited by other articles in PMC. What are the qualities that distinguish a good editorial? Are there certain essential attributes? What should a good editorial do to a reader, and what not?
These are some crucial questions that every editor, editorial board member, journal and its policy makers should decide for themselves and their respective publications. To that extent it is individual, and some may consider it the internal matter of the publication.
However, a broad consensus on certain essential parameters maybe desirable, even essential, if the individual has also to be a significant part of the wider knowledge corpus which all editorials pooled together represent.
We wonder if ever an exercise to publish all editorials of a certain publication has been undertaken, say over a five or ten year period. Or for that matter, say hundred editorials from hundred different editors.
It may make for fascinating reading.
We hope some smart publisher is reading this. It is possible editorials of one editor may have been compiled and published in book form. That itself is not uninteresting. But the flavour of different edits by different authors is, well, in a class by itself.
Wonder if it has been attempted ever? Of course we know why it may not have been done. Editors, by and large, are reticent people, with a magnified sense of their own importance. Well, this may hurt some, but before they jump at our throats, let us clarify that we belong there as well The group of editors, reticent, and pompous.
Hence, they may be willing to publish a book of their own edits, but maybe averse to a book with multiple editors as co-authors. Maybe some smart publisher should manage it. He will make his bucks, for sure. And the readers, including fellow editors, will hugely enjoy the fare offered, as they savour the stuff that goes into edit writing.
And a second important service will be to help deflate some editorial egos, much in need of puncturing, as so many readers would vouch for. Enough of that for the present, for we must concentrate on the questions raised at the beginning of this essay.
And we hope fellow editors can take some ego puncturing sportingly. Are they not doing it to their writers all the time? It helps to get to the other side of the fence on occasions.
Never mind, for those who feel sour faced, there is solace. Their position in the periodical will ensure their ego builds up with some speed once again. Opinion Maker, Reconciliatory, Balanced and Crusading The very first criterion is that a good editorial is an opinion maker. If it is based on evidence, so much the better.
But it analyses evidence rather than produces it. Of course what it analyses can be the basis of the production of new evidence.To sum up, a good editorial is either one or more of the following: it is an opinion maker, it is reconciliatory between contrary viewpoints or standpoints, it is balanced in its analysis of evidence and events, and it is, manifest or otherwise, crusading in its thrust.
WIRED Editorial, Photography, and Video Fellowships.
WIRED is offers six-month-long fellowships focusing on reporting, video, gadgets, fact-checking, and lausannecongress2018.com jobs are located at WIRED. 1. In order to write a good article, first choose your topic and decide its boundaries.
(The topic must be narrowed as much as possible, and the scope of it must be outlined clearly.). 17K Mumbai girl bags top prize at Doodle 4 Google contest with space exploration doodle.
Writing an Editorial. Another Tutorial by: Alan Weintraut Annandale High School Annandale, VA [email protected] CHARACTERISTICS OF EDITORIAL WRITING. Aug 27, · Edit Article How to Write a Magazine Article.
Four Parts: Sample Articles Generating Article Ideas Crafting the Article Revising the Article Community Q&A Magazine articles can be a big boost for seasoned freelance writers or writers who are trying to jump start their writing careers%(11).